ENVISION ENSEMBLE | Premiere Performance

ENVISION ENSEMBLE  w/ Henry Kuntz, Dan Plonsey, Brian Godchaux, John Kuntz, Esten Lindgren at Berkeley Arts Festival  August 27, 2014

ENVISION ENSEMBLE

Henry Kuntz – Dan Plonsey – Brian Godchaux – Esten Lindgren – John Kuntz

Premiere Performance

Notes – Photos – Videos


The Envision Ensemble moves toward an
advanced improvisational archetype,
one in which multiple independent events may occur
while the musicians simultaneously create an experiential musical whole.

Beyond expanding the independence of musical line –
thus increasing the complexity of musical form –
the Envision Ensemble expands the formal independence of each player –
so that multiple musical forms might be happening at once,
moving the music in the direction of what I call “festival form.”

So the players will be creating the total musical space
rather than any specific improvised composition.

ENVISION ENSEMBLE  w/ Henry Kuntz, Dan Plonsey, Brian Godchaux, John Kuntz, Esten Lindgren at Berkeley Arts Festival  August 27, 2014

How will this work?

Each player will simultaneously create an organic complete music.

Each player may relate or not relate
to the music and sounds going on around them,
the same as when one is playing at home
and sounds are occurring in the environment
which may or may not affect one’s music.

While the players will not necessarily
relate to each other in a compositional sense,
they will relate to each other
and to their shared environment experientially
and together create (or “compose,” if you will)
a sympathetically-in-tune experiential musical space –
a space defined by the composite layers of sound that make it up,
similar to the way the simultaneous layers of sound at a festival
define and create the festival.

ENVISION ENSEMBLE  w/ Henry Kuntz, Dan Plonsey, Brian Godchaux, John Kuntz, Esten Lindgren at Berkeley Arts Festival  August 27, 2014

As Archetype:
The Fullness of Individual Being in
Collaborative and Existential Flow
With the Fullness of All Life.”

The performance will be completely improvised.
At my suggestion, the Ensemble has not rehearsed prior to playing.
The reason for this is that experience suggests
that players’ edge of creativity often comes out more
in the initial meeting (i.e. in the rehearsal)
than in the performance.

So, along with the musicians,
you will be experiencing this music
for the very first time.

Henry Kuntz, August 2014, for the Envision Ensemble

ENVISION ENSEMBLE  w/ Esten Lindgren, John Kuntz, Henry Kuntz at Berkeley Arts Festival  August 27, 2014

ENVISION ENSEMBLE  w/ Dan Plonsey, Brian Godchaux, Esten Lindgren at Berkeley Arts Festival  August 27, 2014

ENVISION ENSEMBLE  w/ Esten Lindgren at Berkeley Arts Festival  August 27, 2014

ENVISION ENSEMBLE  w/ Esten Lindgren at Berkeley Arts Festival  August 27, 2014

ENVISION ENSEMBLE  w/ Brian Godchaux at Berkeley Arts Festival  August 27, 2014

ENVISION ENSEMBLE  w/ Dan Plonsey at Berkeley Arts Festival  August 27, 2014 ENVISION ENSEMBLE  w/ Dan Plonsey at Berkeley Arts Festival  August 27, 2014

ENVISION ENSEMBLE  w/ John Kuntz at Berkeley Arts Festival  August 27, 2014

ENVISION ENSEMBLE  w/ John Kuntz, Henry Kuntz at Berkeley Arts Festival  August 27, 2014

ENVISION ENSEMBLE  w/ Henry Kuntz at Berkeley Arts Festival  August 27, 2014

ENVISION ENSEMBLE  w/  Esten Lindgren, John Kuntz, Henry Kuntz at Berkeley Arts Festival  August 27, 2014

Original Performance Photos and Videos by Eleanor Lindgren

Sonic Resonances

SONIC RESONANCES

Borrowed/New/Timeless/Wild BlueYonder

BORROWED

FONG NAAM: The Thai Piphat Ensemble
The Philosophical Thrust of Thai Classical Music: Implications for Improvisation

SIAMESE CLASSICAL MUSIC: Volume 1 – The Piphat Ensemble before 1400 A.D. (Marco Polo 8.223197) Recorded: Siam Pattana Studio Bangkok,Thailand 1990.

SIAMESE CLASSICAL MUSIC: Volume 1 – The Piphat Ensemble before 1400 A.D. (Marco Polo 8.223197)
Recorded: Siam Pattana Studio Bangkok,Thailand 1990.

SIAMESE CLASSICAL MUSIC: Volume 2 – The Piphat Ensemble 1351 – 1767 A.D. (The Afternoon Overture) (Marco Polo 8.223197) Recorded: Siam Pattana Studio Bangkok,Thailand 1990.

SIAMESE CLASSICAL MUSIC: Volume 2 The Piphat Ensemble 1351 – 1767 A.D. (The Afternoon Overture) (Marco Polo 8.223197)
Recorded: Siam Pattana Studio Bangkok,Thailand 1990.

THAI CLASSICAL MUSIC: The Sleeping Angel (Nimbus Records NI 5319) Recorded: All Saints, Harewood, England June 13, 1991.

THAI CLASSICAL MUSIC: The Sleeping Angel (Nimbus Records NI 5319)
Recorded: All Saints, Harewood, England June 13, 1991.

SIAMESE FUNERAL MUSIC: The Nang Hong Suite (Nimbus Records NI 5332) Recorded: St Judes on the Hill, England July 2 & 3, 1991.

SIAMESE FUNERAL MUSIC: The Nang Hong Suite (Nimbus Records NI 5332)
Recorded: St Judes on the Hill, England July 2 & 3, 1991.

SIAMESE CLASSICAL MUSIC: Volume 4 – The Piphat Sepha (Marco Polo 8.223200) Recorded: Trium Udom High School April 24, 1992 & Chulalongkom University Bangkok ,Thailand April 15, 1992.

SIAMESE CLASSICAL MUSIC: Volume 4 The Piphat Sepha (Marco Polo 8.223200)
Recorded: Trium Udom High School April 24, 1992 & Chulalongkom University Bangkok ,Thailand April 15, 1992.

The Founders of FONG NAAM are Boonyong Ketkhong and Bruce Gaston. Boonyong Ketkhong is considered one of the greatest masters of renat ek or soprano xylophone. Bruce Gaston, at the time of these recordings, had been studying Thai music with Boonyong Ketkhong for more than 20 years, teaching at Chulalongkom University and specializing on the khong wong yai or large gong circle.
Various Thai musicians take part on each of these recordings.
Notes on the Recordings: Montri Tramoj, Prasarn Wongwirojruk, and Bruce Gaston.

The Philosophical Thrust of Thai Classical Music: Implications for Improvisation

Some years ago, in the course of formulating ideas about how players might optimally approach free improvisation, I came across several outstanding recordings of Thai classical music. The thinking behind this remarkable music seemed to mesh with and help solidify the directions in which my own musical thinking was going.

As I pointed out in the brief discussion on improvisational form that appears in the Anthony Braxton Echo Echo Music House review (see http://henrykuntz.free-jazz.net/category/echo-echo-mirror-house-music-implications-for-improvisation/), the ways in which players relate to each other improvisationally has everything to do with cultural imprinting. Even when players have vastly expanded concepts of pitch, timbre, harmony, and rhythm, the ways in which they formally relate remains largely culturally determined.

Deeply ingrained concepts of how disparate sounds and musical lines should work together, of the nature of musical “development”, of dynamic and dramatic structure and, moreover, of how music itself ought to be perceived and given weight to retroactively and artistically are notions that are almost never questioned. Generally, the only questions are whether or not one believes some ideal or standard of those concepts has been attained or achieved.

It is instructive then to go inside another culture’s imprint in order to gain a perspective on our own and to view some other ways that music might work. Certain Thai music, of the sort that I came across, provides a quite different world view. I’m speaking mainly of the music of the Thai piphat ensemble, Thailand’s oldest and most archetypical musical grouping.

Although I purchased superb cassettes of this music when I first visited Thailand in 1990, it was only later, when I encountered an exceptional series of CDs by the group FONG NAAM, with extensive and incisive notes on the music, that I began to truly “understand” the Thai musical approach.

Members of Fong Naam - from Sleeping Angel

Members of Fong Naam – from Sleeping Angel

The Thai piphat ensemble is made up of a blown double-reed instrument, the pi, representing the pi in pi-phat, and percussion instruments, representing the phat. In the original piphat orchestra, the percussion instruments were a tuned gong circle (khong wong yai), a large mounted two-sided hand played drum (tapone), a two-sided timpani (glang tat), and small finger cymbals (ching). The soprano xylophone (renat ek), the modern ensemble’s most prominent and signature instrument, was added later, being adopted from folk orchestras.

With its delicately balanced mix of individual and group expression, the music of the piphat ensemble is unlike any western music. While the musical approach of the pi, with its rhythmic and harmonic freedom, might easily pass for a type of free jazz, there is – despite textural variances – virtually no dynamic or dramatic declamation in the music as a whole. Rather the music is built upon and attains its identifiable sound from the extensive individual freedom that exists within the group context.

Allow me to quote you this extraordinary paragraph (my emphasis added) from the notes to Fong Naam’s Siamese

Classical Music: Volume 1:

“In Siamese orchestration there is never any doubling of instruments, a technique much employed in the West. This is because the Thai tradition places great importance on the individual freedom of each player. Each member of the orchestra recites in his head the given melody which is handed down from the Teacher. The joy and interest in listening to the music is to compare the various musical ideas which are concurrently evolving out of a single hidden melody, and it is for this reason that the timbres of the various instruments are designed not to create a homogenous blend as in the Western tradition, but rather to maintain the clarity of the instrumental line. On a deeper level, it might be said of all Thai art that clarity and lightness are the hallmarks of creative expression. In Thai music the most important feature is the establishing of a delicate polarity between the integrity of the group and the freedom of individual expression.”

That may sound like some high ideal of free jazz or free improvisation, but in Thai music the component parts relate and inter-relate completely differently, working from and embodying a quite different cultural imprint.

Of course, in some piphat music, there is an opening thematic statement or a thematic introduction by a solo vocalist but, following from that, the ensemble members re-present the theme in a “characteristic instrumental version” in the manner described above.

There is also an advanced – and astounding – Double Piphat ensemble, but while the orchestra itself is extended, there is no actual doubling of instruments. Rather, there are higher and lower pitched double reeds, soprano and alto xylophones, large and small gong circles, and two different types of small cymbals; and the ideal of musical expression is the same.

Fong Naam – Siamese Funeral Music Session

Fong Naam – Siamese Funeral Music Session

There are also numerous esoteric and subtle aspects to this music as well as historical and modern variations of Thai oral compositional form – all of which are referenced in the notes to the FONG NAAM CDs.

But it is the Thai egalitarian ideal of individual and group interplay – the concept of concurrently evolving musical ideas with clarity of instrumental line – that interests me most about this music. It is an ideal that has influenced my own music and one that I believe can have application to a wide range of thematic and non-thematic based forms of musical improvisation.

Siamese Music Volume 1: The Piphat Ensemble before 1400 A.D. presents music with the original 5-instrument piphat grouping. Two of the CD’s four pieces are played by a “small instrument” ensemble used for accompanying the Thai shadow play. Another piece features an older composition with inclusion of the newer renat ek or soprano xylophone. The remaining piece, # 2 on the CD, is closer to “pure” Thai music; on this piece the full sound of the early 5-instrument ensemble can perhaps heard to greatest advantage. All of the music is fascinating.

Siamese Music Volume 2: The Piphat Ensemble 1351 – 1767 A.D. (The Afternoon Overture) offers a clear and elegant presentation of ten connected pieces played by the full piphat ensemble (i.e. with renat ek). The opening three pieces are longer in length than the subsequent ones, allowing for more extended musical development.

The Sleeping Angel presents two sections of music played by the Double Piphat ensemble as well as pieces for solo instruments and the music of another type of Thai orchestra.

The Nang Hong Suite: Siamese Funeral Music contains two suites of music for Double Piphat ensemble, the first of which, The Nang Hong Suite, is one of the most extraordinary presentations of this music I’ve heard. This is no dreary music. Rather, the music is deliberately lively and upbeat, embodying a Buddhist perspective. The intention is “not to create a new mood of mirth to replace the tears but rather to jolt the listeners onto a higher level: the Middle Level which lies between joy and sorrow.”

Siamese Music Volume 4: The Piphat Sepha presents music that is prefaced by the presentation of a theme by a solo vocalist. The Double Piphat ensemble is featured in an splendid opening “overture” (without vocalist) and in a long closing piece that is based on an “advanced” compositional form requiring players to maintain the integrity of certain structural notes in their instrumental renderings.

NEW

1) A Philosophic Prologue: Transcendence and Being

If one were to approach the free jazz of the Sixties in philosophical terms, one might perceive a dialectical current running through it between new ways of Being on the one hand and the seeking of Spiritual Transcendence on the other. Ornette Coleman’s music might be seen as representing one evolving thread of that dialectic and John Coltrane’s music the other, with the philosophical tension between the two threads informing the music of numbers of other musicians.

Ornette Coleman-Don Cherry 1959 Five Spot Café

Ornette Coleman-Don Cherry 1959 Five Spot Café

While the two threads were not – and are not – necessarily mutually exclusive – and both were highly revolutionary in the context of jazz, whose main function had always been considered as for “entertainment” – it was the brilliant light from the searing sound of Coltrane’s music that illuminated and overshadowed nearly everything else. The new spiritual awareness his music brought to the forefront, the idea of music as a means of spiritual attainment and even enlightenment, re-set the philosophical path for any number of players.

John Coltrane - Impulse Photo Meditations

John Coltrane – Impulse Photo Meditations

Yet once spiritual awareness or transcendence has been attained, one must still live in this world on this planet in this universe. And so most post-Coltrane music – since at least the late 1960s with the emergence of the AACM, and continuing through to the present – might philosophically be viewed as being characterized by broad explorations of new ways of Being – i.e. how can we all actually BE together on this planet – and the bringing together of seemingly opposite stylistic, cultural and creative musical approaches.

Anthony Braxton’s Echo Echo Mirror House Music can be seen as one advanced working model of this kind of philosophical thrust. Within the most advanced free improvised music (say, that of Parker-Guy-Lytton, to choose one example), the evolution of inner formal complexities might philosophically be seen as a reflection and musical negotiation of the wide and complex web of personal, social, and world relations each of us is an ongoing party to. And across the musical spectrum, we can find any number of more or less finely tuned philosophical models – cultural fusions, electronic extensions and mixes, open compositional forms – whose intent is to integrate the seeming opposites in our lives into workable wholes.

What’s interesting is that as New Forms are created – i.e. Archetypes of New Ways of Being – these may themselves move towards a resolution of the Transcendence-Being dialectic. For insofar as form evolves as and becomes a reflection of higher and higher states of reality and Being (which would include a working artistic unity of real world dualities and opposites) so would form itself turn into and become its own Transcendent content – or what might then be reflective of the unity of “heaven and earth.”

Toshimaru Nakamura

Toshimaru Nakamura

There is also a musical form whose philosophical basis might be referred to as that of Pure Being. Onkyo is an original Japanese form based in pure sound that has sought to move beyond personal musical emotions and agendas. One might think of it as a near Zen-like approach to music, a movement toward acceptance without conditions of all Reality. One might also think of it as a minimalist disengagement from real time musical pursuits. But, as onkyo pioneer Toshimaru Nakamura tells us, for him the idea of onkyo grew out an attempt to rebalance his relationship with his instrument (originally, the guitar), allowing the instrument to speak more for itself. So, at its core, onkyo may suggest to us not only a return to a more “primordial” sound sense but a re-thinking from the ground up – i.e. without the weight of historical encumbrance – of what is or can be “instrumental” and “musical” sound and form.

And that brings us to…

2) Gino Robair

Gino Robair – Solo Drums with Ebow

Gino Robair – Solo Drums with Ebow

SOLO DRUMS WITH EBOW (Bug Incision Records BIM – 57)
Gino Robair/ Drums with Ebow.
Recorded: July 4, 2012.

Gino Robair, best known for his de-construction and re-construction of percussion’s component parts (not to mention his outstanding moving-parts opera, I.Norton), takes on this recording a more purely onkyo approach to performance. He subtracts from his music the “activated surfaces” he brings into play as part and parcel of his hands-on percussion work and makes them the central sound source.

While we’ve become accustomed to most onkyo sounds as being so quiet as to be scarcely audible, the up-front sounds we hear on this recording are nothing like that. They include post-industrial screeches and scrapes, rattlings, tweaks and twitters, electronic drones, and raw garage-like drum patterns. Perhaps we should call this music punk-yo!

There is also such a varied and disparate textural and dynamic sound palette that it is difficult to believe that what we’re hearing was created without human interaction or intervention. But that is exactly the case.

Gino Robair

Gino Robair

Robair has taken an ebow (a small electronic device that creates an electromagnetic sound field) and placed it on top of different drum heads with the addition of “blades” and “strings.” Robair describes the process this way:

“The sounds on this recording were produced by placing an Ebow over either a street-sweeper blade or a short length of a guitar string. The Ebow and metal were then placed on the head of a snare drum or floor tom. No effects (reverb, filtering, distortion) were added to the recordings. The sound you hear was captured by a single microphone placed a few inches above the sound source. In these performances, the blade or string was positioned in such a way that they were unstable against the power of the Ebow. This results in rhythms and harmonic modulation that evolve over time and without human interaction. My only involvement was to move the metal item into position and listen to the results. The blades were found on the streets of Berlin, Stockholm, Chicago, New York, San Francisco, London, and Portland, Oregon.”

Can I say I found the resultant sounds to be engaging? Toshimaru Nakamura would say that’s fine but the emotional engagement is all mine, since the sounds themselves simply exist and have not been given human emotional impetus to, except insofar as a person has presented them. So perhaps I should simply say I found this to be a “stimulating” presentation of these particular pure sounds.

Perhaps you may find them stimulating as well.

3) Otomo Yoshihide/ Sachiko M/ Evan Parker/ John Edwards/ Tony Marsh/ John Butcher
QUINTET/SEXTET
(OTORoku 009 Vinyl LP)

3) Otomo Yoshihide/ Sachiko M/ Evan Parker/ John Edwards/ Tony Marsh/ John Butcher QUINTET/SEXTET (OTORoku 009 Vinyl LP)

Otomo Yoshihide / Guitar; Sachiko M / Sine Waves; Evan Parker / Saxophones; John Edwards / Double Bass; Tony Marsh / Drums; John Butcher / Saxophones (Sextet only).
Recorded: March 9, 2009 at Café OTO, London by Shane Browne.
Mixed by John Butcher. Mastered by Andreas Lubich. Pressed at Record Industry in The Netherlands.Three color screenprint cover by Paul Abbott.

Two pioneers and masters of Japanese onkyo meet a multi-generational mix of British pioneers and masters of free improvisation. Recorded live at London’s Café OTO at the end of a week-long residency of the Japanese players, the collaborative musical meeting is fresh and inspired. The recording stands as a finely-honed classic of classically approached free improvisation: the players dance and flow smoothly and effortlessly with and around the sounds of their partners.

Sachiko M

Sachiko M

Otomo Yoshihide

Otomo Yoshihide

Of the two onkyo players, Sachiko M stays the sonic course with high-pitched broken sine waves emitted from her no-samples sampler – but she chooses carefully when and where to insert them. Similarly, Otomo includes the static-y crackles and pops from his turntable. But he is also right in the forefront of the musical mix with his electric guitar. If at moments his playing calls to mind Derek Bailey, Joe Morris, Henry Kaiser or others – not to mention his own work with his New Jazz Quartets and Orchestras – these are but indications of the broad scope of his personal sound world. He works from extremes of electronic inflection, stretching the sound of his guitar in every direction with the infusion of thick sonic clusters, dynamic out-of-phase feints, fuzzy noise, wavy drones, and loosely compacted single note runs. With all that, he establishes a workable link between the onkyo sound world and the singular instrumental approaches of the British improvisers.

 Evan Parker & John Edwards | Photo by Tim Owen

Evan Parker & John Edwards | Photo by Tim Owen

The British players, for their part, are at the top of their game. Parker leads the way on the Quintet side with a particularly energized and earnest performance from his sophisticated post-jazz tenor. But his playing turns on a dime to meet or match the directional input of any of the other musicians. On the Sextet side, the interaction between him and fellow saxophonist John Butcher is fascinating. To open, the two face off on soprano. Butcher, working from his finely crafted range of pure sounds, gravitates quickly toward the onkyo sonic palette, while Parker – with a nod to the flinty tone of his work with the Music Improvisation Company – weaves microtonally through the mix. Following a subtle switch by both men to tenor, Butcher steps out and up into the post-Blue Note jazz world. Parker takes up the challenge and, for a moment, you might think you are listening to Joe Henderson and Pharoah Sanders from something out of Alice Coltrane’s Ptah the El Daoud.

John Butcher

John Butcher

Tony Marsh

Tony Marsh

On both sides of the disc, John Edwards’ big stringy bass helps paste all these sounds together; as a soloist, he quickly engages and segues easily into and out of the large group sections. This is the first time I’ve heard drummer Tony Marsh, and I’m impressed with the way he holds and intensifies the musical experience, adding or subtracting textural breadth and depth to the ensemble. He works from a largely dry palette, tympani-like at times, with contrasting cymbal thrashes.

This is mesmerizing highly-distilled organic improvised music.

Note: Evan Parker writes to tell me that drummer Tony Marsh passed away a year ago. “He was a fantastic drummer and we played a lot together in different groups over the last eight or nine years. …I recall very well the empathy that Tony, John Edwards and I had from the very first gig on Christine Tobin’s series at the Finsbury Tavern. I remember saying to the audience, ‘I feel like I’m channeling John Tchicai tonight.’ The way Tony was relating to my phrasing reminded me very much of the understanding that Tchicai and Milford Graves had in the New York Art Quartet. As is the miraculous way of things, soon after that John and Tony started to play together and became good friends. I feel privileged to have known and played with them.”

Martin Davidson (Emanem Records) writes: “Some ten (or perhaps more) years ago Tony became more involved in Free Improvisation. …He played about six gigs a year in Evan’s trio which also included John Edwards… The results were always superlative. …It struck me that he had a “tangential” approach which avoided the usual or obvious – it reminded me somewhat of Paul Motian’s approach to jazz drumming.”

TIMELESS

John Gruntfest Raven Music Archives

For a couple of years, I’ve wanted to point the way to these early landmark recordings of John Gruntfest, available for free download at The Raven Music Archives by clicking here…

1) 1979 John Gruntfest / Joe Sabella Duos

July 4, 1979 and The Greater Vehicle (from December 4, 1979), both recorded at San Francisco’s Metropolitan Art Center, are hot elemental duos with John on alto saxophone and Joe Sabella on drums.

John Gruntfest and Joe Sabella

John Gruntfest and Joe Sabella

While The Greater Vehicle builds exponentially from spirited (and spiritual) post-Coltrane Africanized modalities, July 4, 1979 is like a streaking comet from a place of “no mind”. Modal operatives have been suspended or internalized, the music manifesting at a higher more potent level of abstraction. Gruntfest’s saxophone soars through the stratosphere, occasionally spinning off of some self generated propulsive axis; it is engulfed by the bold thunderous multi-tiered rhythms of Sabella’s one-man drumming corps.

2) 1980 Free Music Orchestra

Free Music Orchestra/ reeds, brass, flutes, drums and percussion played by a wide array of San Francisco Bay Area improvisers.
Recorded: April 5, 1980 Metropolitan Art Center San Francisco.

Following the success of his 1979 Free Music Orchestra Piece for Forty Horns (see review http://henrykuntz.free-jazz.net/category/john-gruntfest/) John composed a new piece for the 1980 San Francisco Free Music Festival.

With a similarly gargantuan ensemble and a wider range of instruments, the 1980 piece was even more ambitious. At 35 minutes, it was three times as long as the first orchestra piece; there were several thematic propulsion points to fuel its ebullient free-form density; and there was a succession of soloists to provide contrast to the mass sound. The soloists, for their part, had to transitionally hold the emotional weight of the entire ensemble. Most risky of all, at the center of the piece, connecting avant-future with the hopes of the past, was an emotive folk song lament for what was once the promise and grandeur of the land of California.

How does the music sound? The drums and percussion are a cauldron of wild energy while the ensemble sections are texturally molten and blazing; the solos are highly individual language-expansive statements. While the central folk song seems at first musically incongruous to the rest of the piece, it in fact grounds the music and tethers it to its place of origin – California.

As attested to by the wildly enthusiastic audience one hears on the recording, the piece was a rousing success.

What strikes me now about this piece – 34 years removed from its performance – is the underlying depth of passion we all had as players (I was also an orchestra participant) and our underlying belief in the revolutionary thrust of the music we were playing – that, like the trumpets that brought down the walls of Jericho, this music – our music – could make a spiritual, cultural, and political impact and difference.

While it may seem difficult, perhaps even naïve, to hold on to such a belief at this point in time, this music – given impetus to by John Gruntfest – is a reminder that no matter how skewered reality may be or seem, there can be no real way forward without a Sense of the Oneness of All. And that is what stands at the core of this music.

Wild BLUE Yonder

Marc Edwards

Marc Edwards & Slipstream Time Travel PLANET H JUST BLEW UP (Dog and Panda 7)

Marc Edwards & Slipstream Time Travel
PLANET H JUST BLEW UP
(Dog and Panda 7)

Marc Edwards/ drums, Gene Janas/ bass, Ernest Anderson III/ guitar, Takuma Kanaiwa/ guitar, Tor Snyder/ guitar, Lawry Zilmrah/ bicycle wheel electronics.
Recorded: March 28, 2011 live at Funkadelic Studios.

Marc Edwards & Sonos Gravis HOLOGRAPHIC PROJECTION HOLOGRAMS (Dog and Panda 6)

Marc Edwards & Sonos Gravis
HOLOGRAPHIC PROJECTION HOLOGRAMS
(Dog and Panda 6)

Marc Edwards/ drums, Ernest Anderson III/ guitar, Takuma Kanaiwa/ guitar, Alex Lozupone/ 7-string guitar, split-signal bass accompaniment.
Recorded: 2011 live at Local 269, New York
Ordering info for both CDs: http://dogandpanda.com/cdstore/sonos.htm (Use discount code WLK34V5Q)

Free Jazz – Noise Rock drummer Marc Edwards who has been a member of legendary bands with Cecil Taylor, David S. Ware, and Charles Gayle, recently sent me copies of the newest releases with his own groups. He refers to the releases as “a virtual 2-disc set.”

While not trying to make too much of labels, this attractive music is what one might refer to as avant-contemporary music rather than, strictly speaking, avant garde. That means that the music holds a firm sense of its roots while at the same time taking off into the future.

As if drawing on the views from a docking station, each disc presents something like its own interstellar space suite.

Dark Space on Planet H Just Blew Up blends a modal approach to improvisation with slow-building waves of bending psychedelic guitar. The tamboura-like opening evokes Alice Coltrane. Planet H Just Blew Up is more in the mode of the music by Sonos Gravis, with Edwards’ drums exploding into an expansive poly- rhythmic centrifugal force: the guitars circle round the all-encompassing rhythmic center, playing over, under, around and through the colossal thrust. On Suspended Animation, with its swinging Latin jazz-rock feel, Edwards propels the piece with a light and loose forward momentum.

Marc Edwards

Marc Edwards

The quartet disc Holographic Projection Holograms by Sonos Gravis is something else: a next-level guide to the universe for advancing space travelers.

Birth of the Universe features dense, out-of-phase melodic lines and rhythmic clusters by the guitars that coalesce – or not – in and out of pulsing spatial/temporal dimensions. Floating in Space is weightless: the sense of being out of gravity yet surrounded by dark gravitational pulls and cosmic explosions. Star Flakes opens as a “space march” then implodes on itself and goes into a churning cosmic free-fall through unknown super-active galaxies.

I love the spirited vibrancy of Marc Edwards’ new music of the spheres – both with Slipstream Time Travel and with Sonos Gravis – and the exhilarating feeling of being in some boundless out-of-ordinary-time reality.

Welcome to Outer Space!

Henry Kuntz – March 2014
All Rights Reserved

Envision New Music

Henry Kuntz | ENVISION NEW MUSIC (HB CDR 10) Free MP3 Download Available

Henry Kuntz | ENVISION NEW MUSIC

(HB CDR 10)
Free MP3 Download available here… Henry Kuntz – Envision New Music

1. 2-IN-VISION (Duo in 2 Parts) – 4:12 Tenor Saxophone & Voice, Java Gamelan (saron slendro) – August 5, 2013
2. BRIGHT VISION (1st Trio) – 10:24 Bali wood xylophone& Mali balafon, Java gamelan (saron pelog),Thai wood xylophone – July 20, 2012
3. MYTH*STIC VISION (3RD Quartet) – 6:48 Balinese gamelan (gender), Thai wood xylophone,Tenor sax, Java gamelan (saron pelog) – October 1, 2012
4. LONG VISION (1st Quartet) – 6:49 Bamboo flutes, Mexican Indian violin, Tenor sax, Balinese gamelan (gender) – April 14, 2012
5. ROUND VISION (2nd Trio) – 8:59 Balinese wood xylophone, Balinese gamelan (gender), African balafon (Mali) – February 17, 2013
6. VISION SPEAK (2nd Quartet) – 10:22 Tenor Saxophone & Voice is added to the 1st Trio – July 20, 2012
7. DANCE OF DEER, SHADOW OF TIGER – 21:52 Guatemala slit drum & bass drum, 2 different Mexican toy violins, Mexican black clay flutes (Oaxaca) & bells – October 1989

Tape to Digital: Fantasy Studios – Photos: HK 2012 (Mexico) & 1988 (Costa Rica) by Martha Winneker
C & P Humming Bird Records 2013 – Humming Bird CDR 10

Henry Kuntz | ENVISION NEW MUSIC (HB CDR 10) Free MP3 Download Available

Envision: to imagine something not yet in existence

From the beginning, in creating the multi-track pieces, I’ve brought into play a concept I refer to as “festival form”, an idea that has been an essential part of the overall creative approach to what I call Total Music.

“In Total Music, a player’s total musical intelligence may come into play at all times… (In each part of the music), a player’s awareness is that of a total field of activity rather than of specific notes or thrusts. In each part of the music, something like a total musical process is occurring, unique to itself, perhaps able to exist by itself, compatible with but not dependent upon or leading the other parts. The whole, in this way, takes on a considerably greater complexity, having mainly to do with the types of instruments combined, the ‘natural’ differences in ways of playing those instruments, and the actual conceptual approaches employed… I’ve likewise combined instruments with regard to sonority but without regard to pitch, so as to allow a new range of pitches and ‘harmonies’ to result.”
– Notes to Total Music, 1991 (Humming Bird Tapes 009-010)

As a concept, Total Music has served me well. This is music based in real-time free improvisation that occurs within an open-ended “ritual” form – which means that the pieces are mainly meant to be experienced as ongoing processes rather than “heard” as net results.

But it is time to go a step further with experiential form.

Festival Form is itself an experiential form that can fully accommodate all of the elements of “total music”.

It is the umbrella form of any number of festival occasions around the world during which different musical and sound events are occurring simultaneously in the same physical space at the same time. Each “separate” event, however, is fundamentally important to the creation of the whole.

How would this concept work in an actual group improvisational situation, of which the multi-track creations are a type of avant-sonic sketch?

Each player would simultaneously create an organic complete music. Each player would relate or not relate to the other music and sounds going on around them, similar to when one is playing at home and sounds are occurring in the environment which may or may not influence one’s music.

While the players would not necessarily relate to each other in a compositional sense, they would relate to each other and to their shared environment experientially and together create (or “compose,” if you will) a sympathetically-in-tune experiential musical space – a space defined by the composite layers of sound that make it up, similar to the way the simultaneous layers of sound at a festival define and create the festival.

As Archetype: the Fullness of Individual Being in Collaborative and Existential Flow with the Fullness of All Life.

In early 2012, I had the idea of putting together an ensemble of this sort – multi-directional, multi-dimensional, and pan-cultural – which I would call the Envision Ensemble. However, the practical difficulties of organizing such a group and of bringing together players to play the types of instruments I wanted to include moved me in the direction of creating the new pieces which appear on this release. My hope is that they might serve as conceptual prototypes for the music of such an ensemble.

Does this new music sound so different from the multi-track music I’ve been creating all along? I’m not sure, but I believe that new thinking and clarity of thinking about the way one is working can itself give impetus to new form and can begin to expand the music in multiple new directions.

To provide a longer view of what I’ve been up to, I’m including with this release an early multi-track recording of mine from 1989 when I was only beginning to create in this way. Dance of Deer, Shadow of Tiger has a festival form feel to it and reminds me of being in “the village” at festival time. Duration itself (the piece’s 20-plus minute length) was intentionally employed as a means of moving the music out of summation-al/compositional time and into present/experiential time. This is a piece that was meant for release a long time ago but was forgotten about as newer music was created.

With all of these pieces, my intention is to construct a conceptual platform from which to Envision New Music.

Henry Kuntz – October 2013
All Rights Reserved

Buy Henry Kuntz – Envision New Music (CD or MP3) here…

ECHO ECHO MIRROR HOUSE | Music Implications for Improvisation

Echo Echo Mirror House (Septet Victoriaville) 2011: Composition 347+ (Victo CD 125)

ECHO ECHO MIRROR HOUSE Music

Implications for Improvisation

I’ve heard a lot of music over a lot of years, so it takes a sonic jolt of sorts to get me writing these days. Two extraordinary new releases from Anthony Braxton provided the jolt:

Echo Echo Mirror House (Septet Victoriaville) 2011: Composition 347+ (Victo CD 125)
Taylor Ho Bynam/ cornet, bugle, trombone, ipod, Mary Halvorson/ guitar, electric guitar, ipod, Jessica Pavone/ alto, violin, ipod, Jay Rozen/ tuba, ipod, Aaron Siegel/ percussion, vibraphone, ipod, Carl Testa/ contrabass, bass clarinet, ipod, Anthony Braxton/ alto, soprano & sopranino saxophones, ipod, direction & composition.
Recorded: May 21, 2011at Festival Musique Actuelle de Vicoriaville, Canada.

Echo Echo Mirror House (NYC) 2011 Composition 367

Echo Echo Mirror House (NYC) 2011 Composition 367 (NBH 035, download from TricentricFoundation.org)
Anthony Braxton, Andrew Raffo Dewar, James Fei, Steve Lehman, Chris Jonas, Sara Sschoenbeck/ reeds, Taylor Ho Bynam, Reut Regev, Jay Rozen/ brass, Renee Baker, Erica Dicker, Jessica Pavone/ strings, Mary Halvorson/ guitar, Carl Testa/ bass, Aaron Siegel/ percussion.
Recorded: October 7, 2011 live at Roulette, New York.

These releases document the first recorded examples of Braxton’s new Echo Echo Mirror House music. Following on the heels of his advanced Ghost Trance Music (see review by clicking here please…), in which players instrumentally access and include in their compositional renderings any of Braxton’s music from whatever period, in this new Echo Echo Mirror House music the players – in addition to their acoustic instruments – wield IPODs loaded with digitized versions of Braxton’s entire recorded output: the players can instantly access any of Braxton’s recorded music from any period and interject that music over an array of loudspeakers into the new EEMH compositions.

The compositions themselves include no written music. The players are provided with copies of maps that might be linked to anything, like say, NY’s subway system, or highways along the northeastern corridor; superimposed on the maps are graphic elements illustrating how the players might interpret their maps; the players are additionally provided with a set of instructions (“turn north, turn south…take longest route possible…turn to left”, and so on) about how to sonically navigate the cartographic pictorials. Each musician is free to make his or her own interpretation of the piece’s abstract parameters and to proceed through the instructions at their own pace.

ECHO ECHO MIRROR HOUSE | Music Implications for Improvisation

ECHO ECHO MIRROR HOUSE | Music Implications for Improvisation

What does the Echo Echo Mirror House music sound like? To begin with, there are no predetermined openings, so each player begins playing or extracting from their IPODs whatever they like. The whole sounds like an auditory version of those riotously outrageous all over the place light shows that used to accompany music in the 60s. You might think of it as an expansive, hydra-headed sonic menagerie inside of a refractive carnival funhouse!

The music’s impact is initially jarring, as it turns on its head any number of assumptions about how music is supposed to work and transpire. Not that Braxton hasn’t already been traveling down this road – he’s been actively putting forth the idea of all of his music being played and heard together since at least the early 1980s, and he’s been pursuing more and more complex versions of that idea ever since. But the Echo Echo Mirror House music pushes the envelope of that concept to a level not previously heard or imagined.

One online blogger has already likened the impact of the EEMH to that of Coltrane’s 1965 Ascension (Impulse), that beautifully wild and shattering musical outpouring some people are still striving to understand. There’s some truth to that, but an aural antecedent for this music might more readily be found in Marion Brown’s 1970 under-appreciated masterpiece Djinji’s Corner (Side B of Afternoon of a Georgia Fawn, ECM), on which Braxton is one of the players. In that piece, the players engage in what Brown calls “interchangeable discourse”; each musician moves from one “musical station” to another, each station consisting of “primary”, “secondary”, and “miscellaneous” instruments. At each station, the players remain just long enough (a minute or so) to set up a musical phrase on an instrument of choice, then they move on. In the course of the piece, lasting 18 minutes, Brown notes that “there are seven players and seven stations which means there are 49 themes played.”

The effect is not unlike that of the EEMH pieces, though I wouldn’t care to speculate as to how many themes or independent phrases might be heard in the course of these two 60-plus minute compositions.

 Part of Braxton 7tet Victoriaville

There are also significant differences between the two EEMH works. Composition 347+ is, like Djinji’s Corner, played by a septet. There is a good deal of clarity in the recording, and easily identifiable thematic references abound. Live instrumental input can at least at times be heard as separate from recorded interjection.

Composition 376, on the other hand, is played by 15 players (the “12+3 tet”), including 5 reed players, 3 brass players, and 3 string players together with guitar, bass, and percussion. The organized and surprisingly organic cacophony is considerably denser on this piece, and it is more difficult (at least for me) to locate actual thematic material. At times I hear what I think are passing thematic allusions, but the IPOD interjections seem much more abstract in their references than on Composition 347+; either that, or much of the interjected material may be taken from other recent works of Braxton’s not based on thematic material at all (like his Diamond Curtain Wall Music or his Falling River Music, each of which uses graphic scores to orient the players). The whole is like a sonic shape-shifting textural mass within which any number of live and/or recorded instrumental voices darts about in high relief. As a reference, NY Eye and Ear Control (ESP) kept coming to mind as I listened to this piece; or maybe it just sounds at times like an unkempt and rowdy free jazz blowout! And, speaking of Ascension, around the 48th minute, someone plays a vague Ascension-like theme that a number of players pick up on and one part of the music moves into a liquid mix of long lines and colors pushing into and out of each other.

Due to its increased level of abstraction, Composition 376 allows one to more easily hear the form of this music as pure form; i.e. beyond simply a form bearing the overpowering stamp of Braxton’s music. So suppose we were to extend this form to include recorded interjections of some other music (say, Charlie Parker’s music, or Coltrane’s music, or whoever’s music) or any music or all music or maybe even all sounds! Copyright considerations aside, there’s no end of possibilities. But it would seem that, whatever the inclusions, there’s going to be an overriding point of diminishing returns. What happens, say, when these pieces and pieces like them – which to a large extent are built on the sampling of previously recorded pieces – are themselves the main source for new sampling? Eventually it seems like a sound threshold will be reached, and we will have before us some kind of new Noise Music; or there will be something like a reverse “Big Bang” and everything will simply revert to Silence. But, of course, these two possibilities – Noise, and Silence (or at least a “Not-Music” tending toward Silence, based on Japanese onkyo) – are already full-blown musical movements, co-existing in time and space with the Echo Echo Mirror House music.

All this got me thinking about form in general and how formal change or evolution takes place in purely improvised music. That is, how form changes without a composer to give direct impetus to the change.

Many an unspoken assumption is at work regarding how players “listen” to each other in group improvisation situations and what levels of abstraction or complexity, or of noise or silence, they are going to pursue. Players carry with them quite similar imprints about how they are going to relate to each other and about what good relating is. To varying degrees, the players attempt to mimic, match, re-frame, re-phrase, oppose (as an opposite manner of “matching”) and interweave with the creations of their fellows.

A wide range of players has become quite good at this manner of improvising. There’s nothing wrong with this, but the truth is – as we are all aware – much improvised music has lost its edge and become overly predictable in its manner of working.

With its ongoing, changing and simultaneous multiple levels of activity, the EEMH music shifts the foundation upon which those imprinted assumptions about how players ought to relate is based. In a Downbeat interview from March 2012, quoted in the notes to Composition 347+, Braxton explains: “With the ‘Echo Echo Mirror House’ musics, we’re redefining the concept of elaboration. It’s not a linear elaboration. The new models are multi-hierarchical formal states that allow for many different things to happen at the same time…’” Perhaps, then, the EEMH music can provide a nudge in the direction of new ways of improvisational thinking.

So how, in the best of worlds, does a vital free-improvised music work and how does form evolve?

It so happens that at the same time I was listening to Braxton’s new EEMH music, I received a copy of Evan Parker’s newly released solo performance Vaincu.Va!, recorded live at Vancouver’s Western Front on November 8, 1978. This performance came only six days after Parker’s stunning solo presentation at Woody Woodman’s Finger Palace in Berkeley, California (Evan Parker at the Finger Palace, The Beak Doctor 3), a performance I attended and reviewed in my newsletter BELLS).

Vaincu.Va! Evan Parker/ soprano saxophone Recorded: November 8, 1978 at Western Front, Vancouver BC

Vaincu.Va!
Evan Parker/ soprano saxophone
Recorded: November 8, 1978 at Western Front, Vancouver BC

What’s interesting is that while Parker’s saxophone language at the Western Front is not unlike that used at the Finger Palace, the performance itself along with its sense and feeling is completely different.

At the Finger Palace, Parker’s playing moves at a measured pace throughout. It begins by mimicking electronic sound sources, then sets up and swings off a series of shifting rhythmic fulcrums until Parker stands like a Native American shaman at the center of an extremely high-pitched electrical sound field. Then there’s a re-grouping, re-shifting, and an extended exploration of quick rhythmic sound clusters that by the end of the performance is simultaneously firing out crackling electrical currents. The performance lasts some 45 minutes, Parker’s longest single solo presentation.

At the Western Front, the music begins at an extraordinary level of intensity and complexity. While operating from a similar rhythmical base as at the Finger Palace, Parker’s lines in the first few minutes herald the more compact multi-linear expression of his later solo work. (Hear Lines Burnt in Light, Psi, October 2001, for example.) The intensity level continues for nearly half the performance before there begins a kind of deconstruction and reconstruction of the music’s component parts. The performance, every bit as compelling as that at the Finger Palace, lasts around 34 minutes.

Evan Parker 1978 @ Western Front - Image by Kate Craig

Evan Parker 1978 @ Western Front – Image by Kate Craig

Of course, we can now see these as something like transitional recordings of Parker’s solo music, but the performances are complete in themselves. They are based on Parker’s thoroughgoing reinvention of saxophone language, a language that did not exist prior to his creating it.

What is interesting formally about these performances is Parker’s willingness to allow his playing to adapt to its immediate surroundings and to allow it to feint and flow inter-dimensionally, i.e. to play from known dynamically-evolving source rather than from habituation.

But how does improvised music evolve as group music? In the first instance, it evolves – like Parker’s solo music – out of expanded instrumental language which itself comes about from players’ willingness to risk unknown dimensional leaps – i.e. to stay fully in the process of the music while trusting in its outcome. I think back to Topography of the Lungs (Incus), 1970, and why that was such a ground-breaking recording. The formal bounds of improvisation were shattered by three players (Parker, Bailey, Bennink) who had completely reinvented the languages of their instruments. So how could the players have responded to each other in ordinary ways? It would not have been possible.

Along with new ways of playing instruments, the introduction of new instruments – like electronics or electronic processing – out-of-culture instruments, or newly invented instruments can move improvisers’ formal relations in new directions; also, added complexity within what are known processes (for example, Parker-Guy Lytton Zafiro, Maya, 2006); or players’ collaborations with musicians with whom they might not ordinarily play (I think of Derek Bailey’s later work, like his recording Mirakle, Tzadik, with longtime harmelodic masters Jamaaladeen Tacuma and Calvin Westin; or his amazing live recording with Pat Metheny, Gregg Bendian, and Paul Wertigo: disc 1 of The Sign of 4, Knitting Factory Works, 1996).

Yet while each of these ways of formal evolution can work to change the content and shape of improvisers’ playing, none necessarily changes the way in which improvisers actually relate to each other. That takes more of an evolution of consciousness and of a conscious awareness of felt reality, what players find of emotional weight and interest at any given moment and the state of the players’ own nervous system (as both a reflector and artistic imaginer of the societal nervous system).

So credit is due Anthony Braxton for having rescued a good deal of contemporary music from the doldrums and for having pointed some new directions forward. His much-acclaimed quartet music of the 1980s and 90s came along just when the jazz quartet was in need of an infusion of energy and direction. His advanced GTM music and now his new Echo Echo Mirror House is rethinking and reinventing the ways in which players relate to music itself. As for the future… well, you might have a look at his Sonic Genome project on his tricentricfoundation.org website.
There’s obviously more to come!

Henry Kuntz – August 2013
All Rights Reserved